Lactitol
Sources réglementaires consultées
Indications approuvées
- Traitement de la constipation habituelle chez l’adulte et l’enfant de plus de 6 ans, et pour faciliter l’émission des selles après chirurgie anale ou rectale, en cas de fissures anales et d’hémorroïdes.
Contre-indications
Absolues
- Hypersensibilité, obstruction ou occlusion intestinale, symptômes ou suspicion de lésion organique digestive, douleur abdominale non diagnostiquée, saignement rectal, fécalome non traité, troubles héréditaires du métabolisme du fructose ou du galactose et déséquilibre électrolytique préexistant.
Mises en garde cliniques
- Mise en garde majeure · Éviter l’usage prolongé et ininterrompu. Corriger d’abord les troubles électrolytiques et surveiller les électrolytes chez les personnes âgées, fragiles, déshydratées ou hypokaliémiques, surtout lors d’un traitement prolongé. — CIMA, ficha técnica Emportal 10 g
Interactions médicamenteuses
- ModéréeDiuréticos tiazídicos, corticosteroides, carbenoxolona o anfotericina B
Mécanisme: Puede aumentar la pérdida de potasio; la hipopotasemia puede elevar la toxicidad de glucósidos cardiacos.
Recommandation: Vigilar electrolitos y consultar para tratamientos concomitantes.
CIMA FT 59638
- ModéréeMesalazina
Mécanisme: La disminución del pH fecal por lactitol puede impedir la liberación de mesalazina.
Recommandation: Consultar antes de combinar.
CIMA FT 59638
Effets indésirables
Communs (≥1%)
Molestia o dolor abdominal · flatulencia · distensión abdominal · diarrea · vómitos · náuseas
Grossesse et allaitement
L’absorption du lactitol est minime ; la notice indique que le passage dans le lait ne paraît pas cliniquement pertinent, bien qu’il n’ait pas été étudié directement.
Bibliographie récente (PubMed)
This review highlights the causes, types and clinical staging of hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Current concepts on the probable pathogenetic mechanisms and currently practiced therapeutic options are discussed. HE may be covert and overt. Also known as minimal HE. Covert HE, where there are behavioral abnormalities and impairment in activities of daily living with intact sensorium. The pathophysiology of HE remains poorly understood. There is disturbance of the urea cycle due to liver disease leading to increased production of ammonia. The ammonium ion enters the astrocytes along with glutamate (converted to glutamine by ammonia) and myo-inositol, thereby increasing the osmolality of the astrocytic cytoplasm. This osmotic gradient results in accumulation of water inside the astrocytes resulting in cerebral edema and increase in brain volume. Additionally, current research has noted the role of cerebral oxidative/nitrosative stress and the synergistic effects of increased cerebral ammonia and alteration in neurotransmitters, neurometabolites, and cortical excitability due to systemic inflammation. In advanced liver disease with systemic infection or inflammation, neuroinflammatory processes play significant role in the development of HE. Inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α, IL-6, IL-17 in presence of hyperammonemia have been found to induce neurotoxicity of ammonia by passing through the blood brain barrier and causing enlarged/swollen pale astrocytes, resulting in HE. Disrupted enterohepatic circulation in end stage liver disease also causes elevation of bile acids which induces neuroinflammation. Manganese and zinc play as co-factors of enzymatic reaction. These metal deposition causes multiple psychomotor symptoms observed in HE. The gut environment has a major impact on brain function in patients with HE. Toxins such as ammonia and inflammatory cytokines produced by this impaired intestinal flora access the circulation through porto-systemic anastomoses and exacerba
Constipation is a common gastrointestinal problem in the elderly. Because of the limitations of life style modifications and the comorbidity, laxative use is also very common. Therefore, this study reviews the latest literature on the effect and safety of laxative in the elderly. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials investigating the effectiveness and safety of laxatives for constipation in elderly patients over 65 years old were performed using the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Twenty-three randomized controlled trials were included in this review. Among the selected studies, 9 studies compared laxative with placebo and 5 studies compared laxatives of the same type. Four studies compared different types of laxatives or compared combination agents. Five studies compared novel medications such as prucalopride, lubiprostone, and elobixibat with placebo. Psyllium, calcium polycarbophil, lactulose syrup, lactitol, polyethylene glycol, magnesium hydroxide, stimulant laxative with or without fiber, and other medications were more effective than placebo in elderly constipation patients in short-term. Generally, the frequency and severity of adverse effects of laxative were similar between the arms of studies. Bulk laxative, osmotic laxative, stimulant laxative with or without fiber, and other medications can be used in elderly patients in short-term within 3 months with reasonable safety. However, the quality of included studies was not high and most of studies was conducted in a small number of patients. Among these laxatives, polyethylene glycol seems to be safe and effective in long-term use of about 6 months in elderly patients.
Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a peculiar kind of brain dysfunction typical of liver cirrhosis characterized by nonspecific neurological and psychiatric manifestations. HE ranges from minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) to the most severe form characterized by alteration of consciousness or coma (overt HE, OHE). Once the diagnosis of OHE is made, every effort to identify and correct the precipitating cause is essential for the resolution of symptoms. Clinical studies that assessed the prevalence and incidence of any type of HE (MHE and OHE) in patients affected by cirrhosis were included in this review. No language, publication date, or publication status restrictions were imposed. The studies were identified by searching electronic databases (PubMed and SCOPUS). The most widely empirical pharmacological approach consists of non-absorbable antibiotics (rifaximin) and non-absorbable disaccharides (lactulose, lactitol per os and per enemas). Other agents (including branched-chain amino acids, probiotics, other antibiotics, or intravenous L-ornithine L-aspartate) are available, but the evidence supporting their efficacy remains under debate. Gray areas and future needs remain the therapeutic approach to MHE and issues in the design of therapeutic studies for HE which have been extensively discussed in this review.
Rifaximin (RFX) is recommended for the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy (HE). However, evidence on whether RFX application could yield additional benefits for preventing HE in patients with cirrhosis is limited. In this study, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of RFX in preventing HE. We conducted a systematic search of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the use of RFX by analyzing HE incidence, hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and adverse events. Compared with the control group, RFX had a beneficial effect on the primary prevention of HE (RR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.50-0.68), with noncomparable effects to NADs (including lactulose and lactitol, RR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.38-1.11), but more effective than placebo (RR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.47-0.69). After more than 1 month of RFX treatment, the risk of HE decreased significantly (RR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.47-0.65). In secondary prevention of HE, RFX decreased the recurrence risk (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.40-0.61). RFX helped to reduce the incidence of HE after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPSS) (RR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.51-0.96). In terms of adverse effects, RFX was associated with a lower risk of diarrhea than NADs (RR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.00-0.25). So, RFX therapy is effective and well-tolerated in preventing HE, and can be used as the first choice in the prophylaxis of HE after TIPSS.
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) can be an effective treatment for cirrhotic patients who develop variceal bleeding and ascites. However, TIPS placement is associated with an increased risk of developing hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Recently, there have been efforts to use the typical medical therapies prophylactically in patients undergoing TIPS placement to prevent post-TIPS HE. We conducted literature searches in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane to examine studies that use prophylactic medical therapy for preventing post-TIPS HE. A narrative synthesis and grading of recommendations assessment assessment were done for all studies. Meta-analysis was performed for eligible studies using the Mantel-Haenszel method random-effects model. Nine hundred twenty-one articles were screened and 5 studies were included in the study after 2 levels of screening. The medications studied were rifaximin, lactulose, lactitol, L-Ornithine-L-aspartate (LOLA), albumin, and combination therapies. Narrative results showed that lactulose, lactitol, LOLA and albumin prophylaxis were not associated with reduction in HE occurrence or mortality. A combination of rifaximin and lactulose was found to be associated with lower occurrence of HE, and the results were not different when LOLA was added. Meta-analysis (n = 3) showed that rifaximin treatment was not associated with changes in HE occurrences. In conclusion, a vast majority of medications were not found to be effective post-TIPS HE prophylaxis when used alone. A rifaximin and lactulose combination therapy may be beneficial. Overall, there is significant limitation in the current data and more studies are needed to yield more robust meta-analysis results in the future.