prednisolone
Sources réglementaires consultées
Indications approuvées
- Maladies inflammatoires et auto-immunes chez l’adulte et l’enfant à partir de 1 mois, comme l’asthme, les affections allergiques et inflammatoires, la polyarthrite rhumatoïde, les connectivites et certaines dermatoses.
Contre-indications
Absolues
- Maladie virale aiguë, tuberculose latente ou active non traitée et période entourant la vaccination ; les autres contre-indications dépendent de la durée et de l’urgence.
- Hypersensibilité à la prednisolone, aux autres glucocorticoïdes ou aux excipients.
Mises en garde cliniques
- Mise en garde majeure · Utiliser la dose minimale efficace et diminuer progressivement après un traitement prolongé ; un arrêt brutal peut provoquer une insuffisance surrénalienne. — CIMA/AEMPS, ficha técnica 47546
- Mise en garde majeure · Il peut accroître la sensibilité aux infections, réactiver des infections latentes et en masquer les signes. Éviter les vaccins vivants aux doses immunosuppressives. — CIMA/AEMPS, ficha técnica 47546
- Mise en garde majeure · Surveiller la glycémie, la pression artérielle, les électrolytes, la santé osseuse, les symptômes psychiatriques ainsi que les complications oculaires et gastro-intestinales pendant le traitement systémique. — CIMA/AEMPS, ficha técnica 47546
Interactions médicamenteuses
- ModéréeInhibiteurs ou inducteurs du CYP3A4
Mécanisme: Ils peuvent augmenter ou diminuer l’exposition systémique au glucocorticoïde.
Recommandation: Surveiller l’efficacité et la toxicité et n’ajuster que sous supervision clinique.
CIMA/AEMPS, ficha técnica 47546
- SévèreVaccins vivants
Mécanisme: L’immunosuppression peut favoriser une infection disséminée et réduire la réponse vaccinale.
Recommandation: Éviter les vaccins vivants pendant un traitement immunosuppresseur ; planifier la vaccination avec l’équipe soignante.
CIMA/AEMPS, ficha técnica 47546
- ModéréeAntidiabétiques, diurétiques et AINS
Mécanisme: Les glucocorticoïdes peuvent compromettre le contrôle glycémique, aggraver la perte de potassium et augmenter le risque gastro-intestinal.
Recommandation: Surveiller la glycémie et les électrolytes et envisager une gastroprotection ou des alternatives selon le risque.
CIMA/AEMPS, ficha técnica 47546
Effets indésirables
Rares mais graves
Insuffisance surrénalienne, infection opportuniste, hémorragie gastro-intestinale et crise psychiatrique
Grossesse et allaitement
Limiter l’utilisation pendant la grossesse aux cas absolument nécessaires. Elle n’est pas conseillée pendant l’allaitement en raison du passage dans le lait et d’un risque de suppression de la croissance ou des stéroïdes endogènes chez le nourrisson.
Bibliographie récente (PubMed)
The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology (ISHAM) working group proposed recommendations for managing allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) a decade ago. There is a need to update these recommendations due to advances in diagnostics and therapeutics. An international expert group was convened to develop guidelines for managing ABPA (caused by Aspergillus spp.) and allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis (ABPM; caused by fungi other than Aspergillus spp.) in adults and children using a modified Delphi method (two online rounds and one in-person meeting). We defined consensus as ≥70% agreement or disagreement. The terms "recommend" and "suggest" are used when the consensus was ≥70% and <70%, respectively. We recommend screening for A. fumigatus sensitisation using fungus-specific IgE in all newly diagnosed asthmatic adults at tertiary care but only difficult-to-treat asthmatic children. We recommend diagnosing ABPA in those with predisposing conditions or compatible clinico-radiological presentation, with a mandatory demonstration of fungal sensitisation and serum total IgE ≥500 IU·mL-1 and two of the following: fungal-specific IgG, peripheral blood eosinophilia or suggestive imaging. ABPM is considered in those with an ABPA-like presentation but normal A. fumigatus-IgE. Additionally, diagnosing ABPM requires repeated growth of the causative fungus from sputum. We do not routinely recommend treating asymptomatic ABPA patients. We recommend oral prednisolone or itraconazole monotherapy for treating acute ABPA (newly diagnosed or exacerbation), with prednisolone and itraconazole combination only for treating recurrent ABPA exacerbations. We have devised an objective multidimensional criterion to assess treatment response. We have framed consensus guidelines for diagnosing, classifying and treating ABPA/M for patient care and research.
Men with high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer are treated with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for 3 years, often combined with radiotherapy. We analysed new data from two randomised controlled phase 3 trials done in a multiarm, multistage platform protocol to assess the efficacy of adding abiraterone and prednisolone alone or with enzalutamide to ADT in this patient population. These open-label, phase 3 trials were done at 113 sites in the UK and Switzerland. Eligible patients (no age restrictions) had high-risk (defined as node positive or, if node negative, having at least two of the following: tumour stage T3 or T4, Gleason sum score of 8-10, and prostate-specific antigen [PSA] concentration ≥40 ng/mL) or relapsing with high-risk features (≤12 months of total ADT with an interval of ≥12 months without treatment and PSA concentration ≥4 ng/mL with a doubling time of <6 months, or a PSA concentration ≥20 ng/mL, or nodal relapse) non-metastatic prostate cancer, and a WHO performance status of 0-2. Local radiotherapy (as per local guidelines, 74 Gy in 37 fractions to the prostate and seminal vesicles or the equivalent using hypofractionated schedules) was mandated for node negative and encouraged for node positive disease. In both trials, patients were randomly assigned (1:1), by use of a computerised algorithm, to ADT alone (control group), which could include surgery and luteinising-hormone-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists, or with oral abiraterone acetate (1000 mg daily) and oral prednisolone (5 mg daily; combination-therapy group). In the second trial with no overlapping controls, the combination-therapy group also received enzalutamide (160 mg daily orally). ADT was given for 3 years and combination therapy for 2 years, except if local radiotherapy was omitted when treatment could be delivered until progression. In this primary analysis, we used meta-analysis methods to pool events from both trials. The primary endpoint of this meta-analysis wa
Cluster headache belongs to the group of trigeminal autonomic headaches. This review summarizes drug therapy of cluster attacks and prophylactic treatment. Neurostimulation methods are not addressed. The therapy for acute cluster attacks includes inhalation of 100% oxygen, subcutaneous administration of sumatriptan, and intranasal application of sumatriptan or zolmitriptan. Bridging therapy, which is used until oral prophylactic therapy is effective, is performed either with oral prednisolone or with a pharmacological block of the major occipital nerves. Best documented drugs for preventive treatment of cluster headache are verapamil and lithium, and possibly effective drugs are gabapentin, topiramate, divalproex sodium, and melatonin. The efficacy of monoclonal antibodies to the calcitonin gene-related peptide so far has been only demonstrated for episodic cluster headache. Several drug therapies are being investigated including ketamine, onabotulinumtoxinA, lysergic acid, and sodium oxybate.
Glucocorticoids are the mainstay for the treatment of croup. The existing evidence demonstrates that glucocorticoids are effective in the treatment of croup in children. However, updating the evidence on their clinical relevance in croup is imperative. This is an update to a review first published in 1999, and updated in 2004, 2011, and 2018. To investigate the effects and safety of glucocorticoids in the treatment of croup in children aged 18 years and below. We searched the Cochrane Library, which includes the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2022 Issue 9), Ovid MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to 4 March 2022), Embase (Ovid) (1974 to 4 March 2022). We also searched the WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov on 4 March 2022. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in children (aged 18 years and below) with croup. We assessed the effect of glucocorticoids compared to the following: placebo, any other pharmacologic agents, any other glucocorticoids, any combination of other glucocorticoids, given by different modes of administration, or given in different doses. The included studies must have assessed at least one of our primary outcomes (defined as the change in croup score or return visits, (re)admissions to the hospital or both) or secondary outcomes (defined as the length of stay in hospital or emergency departments, patient improvement, use of additional treatments, or adverse events). Review authors independently extracted data, with another review author verified. We entered the data into Review Manager 5 for meta-analysis. Two review authors independently assessed studies for risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Two review authors assessed the certainty of the evidence for the primary outcomes using the GRADE approach. This updated review includes 45 RCTs with a total of 5888 children, an increase of two RCTs with 1323 children since the last update. We also i