dicloxacillin
Sources réglementaires consultées
Indications approuvées
- Infections dues à des staphylocoques producteurs de pénicillinase sensibles à la dicloxacilline.
Contre-indications
Absolues
- Hypersensibilité à la dicloxacilline ou antécédent d’hypersensibilité à une pénicilline.
Mises en garde cliniques
- Mise en garde majeure · Il peut provoquer une hypersensibilité sévère ou une anaphylaxie. Rechercher tout antécédent de réaction immédiate aux bêta-lactamines avant l’emploi et arrêter en cas de réaction allergique. — FDA, set_id 24e821aa-85b8-4f5a-aa13-83ff132952ca
- Mise en garde majeure · Il peut provoquer une diarrhée associée à Clostridioides difficile pendant ou après le traitement ; évaluer toute diarrhée importante et éviter les antipéristaltiques si une colite est suspectée. — FDA, set_id 24e821aa-85b8-4f5a-aa13-83ff132952ca
Interactions médicamenteuses
- SévèreWarfarine et dicoumarol
Mécanisme: La dicloxacilline peut réduire la réponse anticoagulante.
Recommandation: Surveiller le temps de prothrombine/INR et ajuster l’anticoagulant.
FDA, set_id 24e821aa-85b8-4f5a-aa13-83ff132952ca
- ModéréeProbénécide
Mécanisme: Il réduit la sécrétion tubulaire rénale et peut augmenter et prolonger l’exposition à l’antibiotique.
Recommandation: Éviter l’association sauf indication délibérée et surveiller la toxicité.
FDA, set_id 24e821aa-85b8-4f5a-aa13-83ff132952ca
- ModéréeTétracyclines
Mécanisme: Elles peuvent antagoniser l’action bactéricide de la pénicilline.
Recommandation: Éviter l’association si possible.
FDA, set_id 24e821aa-85b8-4f5a-aa13-83ff132952ca
Effets indésirables
Communs (≥1%)
Nausées, diarrhée et éruption cutanée
Rares mais graves
Anaphylaxie, colite à C. difficile et cytopénies sévères
Grossesse et allaitement
Utiliser pendant la grossesse uniquement en cas d’indication claire. De faibles quantités passent dans le lait ; surveiller diarrhée, candidose ou sensibilisation chez le nourrisson et réévaluer la poursuite selon le produit.
Bibliographie récente (PubMed)
Bone and joint infections (BJIs) are treated with intravenous antibiotics, which are burdensome and costly. No randomised controlled studies have compared if initial oral antibiotics are as effective as intravenous therapy. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of initial oral antibiotics compared with initial intravenous antibiotics followed by oral antibiotics in children and adolescents with uncomplicated BJIs. From Sept 15, 2020, to June 30, 2023, this nationwide, randomised, non-inferiority trial included patients aged 3 months to 17 years with BJIs who presented to one of the 18 paediatric hospital departments in Denmark. Exclusion criteria were severe infection (ie, septic shock, the need for acute surgery, or substantial soft tissue involvement), prosthetic material, comorbidity, previous BJIs, or antibiotic therapy for longer than 24 h before inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), stratified by C-reactive protein concentration (<35 mg/L vs ≥35 mg/L), to initially receive either high-dose oral antibiotics or intravenous ceftriaxone (100 mg/kg per day in one dose). High-dose oral antibiotics were coformulated amoxicillin (100 mg/kg per day) and clavulanic acid (12·5 mg/kg per day) in three doses for patients younger than 5 years or dicloxacillin (200 mg/kg per day) in four doses for patients aged 5 years or older. After a minimum of 3 days, and upon clinical improvement and decrease in C-reactive protein, patients in both groups received oral antibiotics in standard doses. The primary outcome was sequelae after 6 months in patients with BJIs, defined as any atypical mobility or function of the affected bone or joint, assessed blindly, in all randomised patients who were not terminated early due to an alternative diagnosis (ie, not BJI) and who attended the primary outcome assessment. A risk difference in sequelae after 6 months of less than 5% implied non-inferiority of the oral treatment. Safety outcomes were serious complications, the n
Bacterial skin infections represent a significant health care burden. Cellulitis and erysipelas are rapidly spreading, painful, superficial skin infections, usually caused by streptococci or Staphylococcus aureus. Folliculitis is an infection of hair follicles mostly caused by S aureus. Simple folliculitis typically is self-limited. Topical benzoyl peroxide is a first-line nonantibiotic treatment. Mupirocin and clindamycin are topical antibiotic options. For treatment-resistant cases, oral cephalexin or dicloxacillin is an appropriate option. Impetigo is a common, self-limited infection in children. Bullous impetigo is caused by S aureus, and nonbullous impetigo is caused by beta-hemolytic streptococci, S aureus, or both. In most cases, topical mupirocin or retapamulin (Altabax) is effective. Oral antibiotics should be considered for household outbreaks or patients with multiple lesions. Abscesses are red, painful collections of purulence in the dermis and deeper tissues caused by S aureus or polymicrobial infections. Furuncles are abscesses of a hair follicle, whereas carbuncles involve several hair follicles. In recurrent cases of these lesions, culture of the exudate is recommended. Abscess, furuncle, and carbuncle management consists of incision and drainage. Oral antibiotics are not necessary in most cases but should be prescribed for patients with severe immunocompromise or systemic signs of infection. In bacterial skin infections, methicillin-resistant S aureus coverage should be considered for patients with infections that have not improved with treatment.
Impetigo is a superficial skin infection that most commonly affects children 2 to 5 years of age. In the United States, more than 3 million cases of impetigo occur annually. Impetigo can be nonbullous (70%) or bullous (30%) and is most commonly caused by group A streptococcus and Staphylococcus aureus. Diagnosis of impetigo is based primarily on clinical examination and should be suspected in individuals with erythematous papules that progress to ruptured vesicles or bullae over 4 to 6 days, forming honey-colored crusts. Risk factors for impetigo include disruptions to the skin barrier, poor hygiene, crowded living environments, living in hot and humid climates, malnutrition, and diabetes. Topical mupirocin 2% ointment or retapamulin 1% ointment are the recommended initial treatments for mild, nonbullous and bullous impetigo. Oral antibiotics, such as dicloxacillin or cephalexin, should be targeted to group A streptococci and S. aureus and are recommended for outbreaks to decrease infection transmission or for severe, multilesional disease that does not respond to topical therapy within 3 to 5 days. Reducing the spread and recurrence of impetigo includes good hand hygiene, thoroughly washing objects used by people with impetigo, and refraining from returning to work or school until 12 to 24 hours after initiating antibiotic treatment or clinical improvement occurs.
Anti-staphylococcal penicillins (ASPs) are among the most commonly prescribed antibiotics in children and are associated with a risk of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Despite the frequent use of ASPs in children, there is no consensus on whether liver function tests (LFTs) should be routinely monitored during treatment. To review the literature on the frequency of ASP-related DILI in children to determine the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of hepatotoxicity. PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase were searched in January 2022 for original studies of children who received cloxacillin, dicloxacillin, flucloxacillin, methicillin, nafcillin or oxacillin that included ≥10 children aged up to 18 years, and presented data on the incidence of DILI in children exposed to ASPs. Overall, two studies of oral flucloxacillin, two of intravenous (IV) methicillin, three of IV nafcillin and four of IV oxacillin were included. The mean onset of DILI ranged between 7.0 and 19.0 days following commencement of antibiotic treatment and all episodes resolved between 14.2 and 16.0 days after drug discontinuation, with no specific treatment required. This review found that the incidence of DILI in children was 1 in 50 000 for oral flucloxacillin and ranged from 1 in 3 to 13 for IV oxacillin, methicillin and nafcillin. This review found that routine LFT monitoring is not required in children receiving low dose oral flucloxacillin in a primary care setting, although pharmacovigilance is critical. For IV preparations, the existing data support routine LFT monitoring in those receiving treatment for at least 7 days.