micafungin
Sources réglementaires consultées
Indications approuvées
- Candidose invasive, candidose œsophagienne et prophylaxie de Candida chez des patients sélectionnés.
Contre-indications
Absolues
- Hypersensibilité à la micafungine, aux autres échinocandines ou aux excipients.
Mises en garde cliniques
- Elle peut provoquer une anaphylaxie ; arrêter et traiter immédiatement. — CIMA/AEMPS, ficha técnica 85333
- Surveiller hémolyse/hémoglobinurie, fonction rénale et hépatotoxicité. En raison de foyers et tumeurs hépatiques précliniques, utiliser seulement après évaluation des alternatives, surtout en prophylaxie. — CIMA/AEMPS, ficha técnica 85333
Interactions médicamenteuses
- ModéréeSirolimus, nifédipine ou itraconazole
Mécanisme: La micafungine peut augmenter leur exposition.
Recommandation: Surveiller la toxicité et réduire le substrat si nécessaire.
CIMA/AEMPS, ficha técnica 85333
Effets indésirables
Communs (≥1%)
Fièvre, nausées, diarrhée, céphalées et anomalies du bilan hépatique
Rares mais graves
Anaphylaxie, hémolyse, insuffisance rénale et lésion hépatique sévère
Grossesse et allaitement
Éviter pendant la grossesse sauf nécessité claire. Décider de l’allaitement selon le bénéfice et le risque.
Bibliographie récente (PubMed)
Candidiasis is a highly pervasive infection posing major health risks, especially for immunocompromised populations. Pathogenic Candida species have evolved intrinsic and acquired resistance to a variety of antifungal medications. The primary goal of this literature review is to summarize the molecular mechanisms associated with antifungal resistance in Candida species. Resistance can be conferred via gain-of-function mutations in target pathway genes or their transcriptional regulators. Therefore, an overview of the known gene mutations is presented for the following antifungals: azoles (fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole and itraconazole), echinocandins (caspofungin, anidulafungin and micafungin), polyenes (amphotericin B and nystatin) and 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC). The following mutation hot spots were identified: (1) ergosterol biosynthesis pathway mutations (ERG11 and UPC2), resulting in azole resistance; (2) overexpression of the efflux pumps, promoting azole resistance (transcription factor genes: tac1 and mrr1; transporter genes: CDR1, CDR2, MDR1, PDR16 and SNQ2); (3) cell wall biosynthesis mutations (FKS1, FKS2 and PDR1), conferring resistance to echinocandins; (4) mutations of nucleic acid synthesis/repair genes (FCY1, FCY2 and FUR1), resulting in 5-FC resistance; and (5) biofilm production, promoting general antifungal resistance. This review also provides a summary of standardized inhibitory breakpoints obtained from international guidelines for prominent Candida species. Notably, N. glabrata, P. kudriavzevii and C. auris demonstrate fluconazole resistance.
Invasive fungal infections continue to be important causes of morbidity and mortality in severely ill and immunocompromised patient populations. The past three decades have seen a considerable expansion in antifungal drug research, resulting in the clinical development of different classes of antifungal agents with different pharmacologic properties. Among drug-specific characteristics of antifungal agents, renal disposition and nephrotoxicity are important clinical considerations as many patients requiring antifungal therapy have compromised organ functions or are receiving other potentially nephrotoxic medications. The present article reviews incidence, severity and mechanisms of nephrotoxicity associated with antifungal agents used for prevention and treatment of invasive fungal diseases by discussing distribution, metabolism, elimination and drug-related adverse events in the context of safety data from phase II and III clinical studies. Based on the available data amphotericin B deoxycholate has the highest relative potential for nephrotoxicity, followed by the lipid formulations of amphotericin B, and, to a much lesser extent and by indirect mechanisms, the antifungal triazoles.
At the 10th European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL), the guidelines for antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric and adult patients with hematological malignancies (HM) were updated and some changes introduced. Regarding acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients undergoing remission induction chemotherapy, a B-II grading has been assigned to isavuconazole, micafungin, and caspofungin, based on non-randomized studies that have shown efficacy in preventing invasive fungal diseases (IFD). Regarding high-risk MDS patients treated with azacytidine, prophylaxis with posaconazole during the first four cycles of treatment is supported in the literature. Prophylaxis is not indicated in patients treated for myeloproliferative neoplasms (NPM), acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL), and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). For patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), prophylaxis is not generally indicated. For patients with multiple myeloma (MM), prophylaxis is not indicated and the limited epidemiological data available do not support the use of prophylaxis in subjects treated with bispecific antibodies. For patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), no substantial changes were made, apart from the addition of isavuconazole with grading B-II in the post-engraftment period. In patients undergoing auto-HSCT, antifungal prophylaxis is not indicated. Previous ECIL guidelines did not include CAR-T cells. The expert panel proposes to endorse the use of anti-mold prophylaxis in high-risk patients during pre-infusion and post-infusion, while in low-risk patients, anti-yeast prophylaxis can be recommended (B-II). For pediatric hematology patients, based on newly published data, caspofungin received a B-I grading as mold-active prophylaxis. Moreover, patients with ALL with insufficient treatment response during induction therapy, and children older than 12 y.o are now considered at high risk f
With increasing number of immunocompromised patients as well as drug resistance in fungi, the risk of fatal fungal infections in humans increases as well. The action of echinocandins is based on the inhibition of β-(1,3)-d-glucan synthesis that builds the fungal cell wall. Caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin and rezafungin are semi-synthetic cyclic lipopeptides. Their specific chemical structure possess a potential to obtain novel derivatives with better pharmacological properties resulting in more effective treatment, especially in infections caused by Candida and Aspergillus species. In this review we summarise information about echinocandins with closer look on their chemical structure, mechanism of action, drug resistance and usage in clinical practice. We also introduce actual trends in modification of this antifungals as well as new methods of their administration, and additional use in viral and bacterial infections.
In recent years, many population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models have been developed for echinocandins to better understand the pharmacokinetics (PK) of these antifungals. This comprehensive review aimed to summarize popPK models of echinocandins (micafungin, caspofungin, anidulafungin, and rezafungin), by focusing on dosage optimization to maximize the probability of attaining the PK/PD target proposed in special populations. A search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus, supplemented by the bibliography of relevant articles, was conducted from inception to March 2024, including both observational and prospective trials. A total of 1126 articles were identified, 47 of them were included in the review (22 for micafungin, 13 for caspofungin, 9 for anidulafungin, and 3 for rezafungin). A two-compartment model was more frequently used to describe the PK parameters of echinocandin (78.7% of developed models), although more complex structural models with three and four compartments have also been developed. The covariates to estimate the PK parameters such as clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vd) differed between models. Weight total (WT) was the most frequently reported to be a significant predictor for both parameters, especially for estimating the CL in pediatrics. The PD parameter most widely reported assessing the drug exposure-efficacy relationship was the area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio (AUC0-24/MIC) with different targets proposed for each echinocandin. In certain populations such as patients that are critically ill, obese, receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and/or continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), or pediatric patients and/or patients with cancer or that are immunocompromised, the fixed dosing strategies recommended in the drug prescribing information may not reach the PK/PD target. For these populations, different strategies have been proposed, such as a dosing