valaciclovir
Sources réglementaires consultées
Indications approuvées
- Traitement et prevention des infections approuvees a virus varicelle-zona et herpès simplex. La prophylaxie et le traitement du CMV sont limites a la periode suivant une transplantation rénale ou cardiaque ; chez les patients a haut risque, utiliser le valaciclovir uniquement lorsque des raisons de sécurité excluent le ganciclovir ou le valganciclovir.
Contre-indications
Absolues
- Hypersensibilité au valaciclovir ou à ses excipients.
Mises en garde cliniques
- L’accumulation peut provoquer insuffisance rénale aiguë et effets neurologiques, notamment confusion, hallucinations, convulsions et encéphalopathie ; adapter et hydrater. — CIMA/AEMPS, ficha técnica 74717
- Une microangiopathie thrombotique, PTT/SHU, a été rapportée, surtout chez les patients immunodéprimés recevant de fortes doses. — CIMA/AEMPS, ficha técnica 74717
- Un DRESS potentiellement mortel ou fatal a ete rapporte. Arrêter immédiatement le valaciclovir en cas de signes compatibles et ne jamais le reprendre si le DRESS est confirme. — CIMA/AEMPS, ficha técnica 74717
Interactions médicamenteuses
- SévèreMédicaments néphrotoxiques ou concurrençant la sécrétion tubulaire, notamment probénécide et cimétidine
Mécanisme: Ils peuvent augmenter l’exposition et le risque rénal.
Recommandation: Maintenir l’hydratation et surveiller fonction rénale et toxicité.
CIMA/AEMPS, ficha técnica 74717
Effets indésirables
Communs (≥1%)
Céphalées et nausées
Rares mais graves
Insuffisance rénale aigue, encephalopathie, convulsions, PTT/SHU et DRESS
Grossesse et allaitement
Utiliser pendant la grossesse lorsqu’il est cliniquement indiqué. Le valaciclovir/l’aciclovir passent dans le lait ; évaluer l’exposition du nourrisson et la nécessité du traitement.
Bibliographie récente (PubMed)
Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection carries a significant burden with a 0.64% global prevalence and a 17-20% chance of serious long-term effects in children. Since the last guidelines, our understanding, particularly regarding primary maternal infections, has improved. A cCMV guidelines group was convened under the patronage of the European Society of Clinical Virology in April 2023 to refine these insights. The quality and validity of selected studies were assessed for potential biases and the GRADE framework was employed to evaluate quality of evidence across key domains. The resulting recommendations address managing cCMV, spanning prevention to postnatal care. Emphasizing early and accurate maternal diagnosis through serological tests enhances risk management and prevention strategies, including using valaciclovir to prevent vertical transmission. The guidelines also strive to refine personalized postnatal care based on risk assessments, ensuring targeted interventions for affected families.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common cause of viral infection in newborn babies, and affects 1 in 200 of all live born infants in high-income countries; and 1 in 71 in low- and middle-income countries. It is a major cause of hearing loss and brain damage. Women may get CMV infection for the first time during pregnancy (primary infection) or may experience 'non-primary' infection, either by reactivation of previous CMV infection or by a new infection with a different strain of the virus. The most common source of infection to pregnant women is the saliva and urine of young children. Therefore, all pregnant women, especially those in regular contact with young children, should be informed about hygiene-based measures to reduce the risks, e.g. handwashing. The UK National Screening Committee recommends against universal antenatal or newborn screening for CMV. Testing for CMV is usually offered only to women who develop symptoms of influenza, glandular fever or hepatitis (liver inflammation) during pregnancy, or for those whom a routine ultrasound scan detects fetal anomalies that suggests possible CMV infection. The risk of harm to the fetus is greatest following primary CMV infection of the woman in early pregnancy, and appears to be very low following infection after 12 weeks of pregnancy. Babies with CMV infection at birth may have jaundice, a rash, enlarged liver or spleen, a small brain, or be small for their gestational age. Around 1 in 8 babies born with CMV infection will have clinically detectable signs at birth. The rest will not have any features detectable by clinical examination alone. Therefore, all infants with CMV infection at birth should be followed up at a minimum of up to 2 years of age or later, depending upon the disease status, to check hearing and brain development. Following primary CMV infection in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, if the woman starts taking the antiviral medicine valaciclovir (valacyclovir) it reduces the risk of the baby
Congenital human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the most common congenital infection, affecting around 1 in 200 infants in high-income settings. It can have life-long consequences for up to one in four children, including sensorineural hearing loss and neurodisability. Despite the frequency of congenital CMV and the severity for some children, it is a little-known condition by pregnant women, families and healthcare providers. Timely diagnosis of CMV infection in pregnancy is important to facilitate consideration of treatment with valaciclovir, which may reduce the risk of transmission to the fetus or reduce the severity of the outcomes for infected infants. Recognition of features of congenital CMV is important for neonatologists, paediatricians and audiologists to prompt testing for congenital CMV within the first 21 days of life. Early diagnosis gives the opportunity for valganciclovir treatment, where appropriate, to improve outcomes for affected infants. Further research is urgently needed to inform decisions about antenatal and neonatal screening, long-term outcomes for asymptomatic and symptomatic infants, predictors of these outcomes and optimal treatment for women and infants.
Acute retinal necrosis (ARN) is a rare but severe ophthalmic pathology defined by panuveitis, retinal necrosis, and high rates of retinal detachment. ARN may lead to poor visual outcomes even if promptly diagnosed and treated. ARN may present with a wide spectrum of clinical findings compatible with panuveitis including anterior uveitis, scleritis, vitritis, necrotizing retinitis, occlusive vasculitis, and optic disc edema. The American Uveitis Society introduced clinical criteria in 1994 for the diagnosis of ARN, while more recent criteria have been proposed by the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group and the Japanese ARN Study Group. Multimodal imaging is a valuable tool in evaluating patients with ARN, particularly in unusual cases, while utilizing retinal imaging and applying AI algorithms in these areas of clinical research could be highly beneficial. Over the last few years, significant progress has been made in achieving timely diagnosis and treatment. The precise identification of the viral cause in suspected ARN cases has been greatly enhanced by the advancements in PCR techniques and flow cytometry used for intraocular fluids. systemic (intravenous or oral) antivirals with adjunctive intravitreal antiviral therapy are recommended as first-line therapy to reduce disease severity, the risk of vision loss, and retinal detachment incidence. Although aciclovir was the first existing antiviral agent, at present many clinicians prefer high-dose valaciclovir orally or intravenous aciclovir combined with intravitreal foscarnet. Despite significant progress in diagnosing and treating ARN, further research is needed to improve visual outcomes in this challenging clinical condition. 摘要: 急性视网膜坏死 (ARN) 是一种临床少见但发病严重的以全葡萄膜炎、视网膜坏死和视网膜脱离为特征的眼科疾病。即使诊断和治疗及时, ARN仍可导致视力不佳。ARN可能表现与全葡萄膜炎相关的多种临床表现, 包括前葡萄膜炎、巩膜炎、玻璃体炎、坏死性视网膜炎、闭塞性视网膜血管炎和视盘水肿。美国葡萄膜炎学会于1994年引入ARN诊断的临床标准, 而最近的诊断标准由葡萄膜炎命名标准化工作组 (SUN) 和日本ARN研究组提出。多模态成像是评估ARN的有价值工具, 尤其在少见病例中, 利用视网膜成像并在临床研究中应用人工智能算法可能有
The most refractory symptom of herpes zoster (HZ) is pain. Approximately 90% of people who have HZ suffer from pain. Early use of antiviral medications has been found to reduce pain across all stages of the disease. Although many antiviral agents via oral or intravenous administration were recommended by clinical practice, the best approach to prevent HZ-associated pain remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and adverse events of various antiviral agents used for the treatment of HZ-associated pain through a network meta-analysis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and PubMed were searched from inception to Feb 2020. Randomized clinical trials evaluating antiviral agents currently available for treating HZ-associated pain were included. We extracted data in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and conducted network meta-analyses with random-effects models. The primary outcome was the presence of acute pain at the end of anti-virus treatment, and the secondary outcomes included the presence of pain at 28-30 days after the onset of the acute herpetic rash, the presence of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), and any other adverse events. A total of 17 randomized control trials with 5,579 participants were included in this study. According to the results of the network meta-analysis, for the treatment of acute pain, there was no significant difference between oral acyclovir and intravenous acyclovir. Furthermore, oral famciclovir was the most effective treatment concerning both the odds ratio (OR) (superior to placebo OR = 0.25; 95% CI: 0.13~0.48) and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 0.84 for the treatment of acute pain among all the oral antiviral agents. For the presence of pain at 28-30 days, no significant difference was observed in efficacy between all antiviral treatments and place