pralatrexate
Sources réglementaires consultées
Indications approuvées
- Lymphome périphérique à cellules T en rechute ou réfractaire ; autorisation accélérée conditionnée à la confirmation du bénéfice clinique.
Mises en garde cliniques
- Contrôler numération et mucite avant le traitement puis chaque semaine ; évaluer fonctions rénale et hépatique avant les doses 1 et 4. Ne pas administrer avant mucite ≤grade 1, PNN ≥1 000/mm³ et plaquettes ≥100 000/mm³ pour la première dose ou ≥50 000/mm³ pour les suivantes. — DailyMed, set_id cc3df863-c51c-49c5-283a-d6808fb49258
- Évaluer la mucite avant chaque dose et différer ou réduire selon la gravité. Des réactions cutanées sévères ou mortelles, un syndrome de lyse tumorale et une hépatotoxicité peuvent survenir. — DailyMed, set_id cc3df863-c51c-49c5-283a-d6808fb49258
Interactions médicamenteuses
- SévèreProbénécide ou AINS
Mécanisme: Ils peuvent augmenter l’exposition et les effets indésirables du pralatrexate.
Recommandation: Éviter l’association ; si elle est inévitable, surveiller étroitement la toxicité.
DailyMed, set_id cc3df863-c51c-49c5-283a-d6808fb49258
Grossesse et allaitement
Peut provoquer une atteinte fœtale. Vérifier la grossesse avant le traitement. Les femmes doivent utiliser une contraception pendant le traitement et pendant 6 mois après ; les hommes ayant une partenaire fertile, pendant le traitement et pendant 3 mois après. Ne pas allaiter pendant le traitement ni pendant 1 semaine après.
Bibliographie récente (PubMed)
Recent advancements in comprehending peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) validate and broaden our perspective, highlighting their diverse nature and the varying molecular mechanisms underlying the entities. Based on a comprehensive accumulated understanding, the PTCLs currently overcome the most challenging features of any disease: rarity, incredible heterogeneity, and a lack of any established standard of care. The treatments deployed in the front-line are extrapolated from regimens developed for other diseases. The recent approval of the three drugs brentuximab vedotin (BV), pralatrexate, and belinostat for patients with relapsed or refractory disease has provided clues about pathophysiology and future directions, though challenges satisfying post-marketing requirements (PMR) for those accelerated approvals have led to one of those drugs being withdrawn and put the other two in jeopardy. Edits of the front-line regimens, often called CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone)-plus approaches, look more like CHOP-minus strategies, as the toxicity of five-drug regimens often reduces the dose intensity of the added 'novel' drug, nullifying any hope of an advance. The turmoil in the field produced by the aforementioned, coupled with an ever-changing classification, has left the field uncertain about the path forward. Despite these challenges, empiric findings from studies of novel drug approaches, coupled with a logic emerging from studies of PTCL lymphomagenesis, have begun to illuminate, albeit faintly for some, a potential direction. The empiric finding that drugs targeting the discrete components of the PTCL epigenome, coupled with the description of multiple mutations in genes that govern epigenetic biology, offers, at the very least, an opportunity to finally be hypothesis-driven. The most recent recognition that the only combination of drugs shown to markedly improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with relapsed disease is one
Peripheral T-cell Lymphomas (PTCL) are a heterogenous group of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas that are far less sensitive to chemotherapy than their B-cell counterparts. Despite their poor prognosis, they are treated similarly to most aggressive B-cell lymphomas, heavily relying on CHOP or CHOP-like combination chemotherapy irrespective of their different subtypes or biology. The last decade has seen the emergence of many targeted therapies that include histone deacetylase inhibitors, hypomethylating agents, monoclonal antibodies and PIK3 inhibitors, among others. However, prognosis remains poor especially in the relapsed/refractory setting. Using an extensive pubmed search, the authors will be summarizing the different trials that led to these approved targeted agents as well as novel combination strategies. The fundamental recognition that different subtypes of PTCL have specific biological features that drive not only proliferation, but also responses to different treatment approaches, should be informing the design of future clinical trials.
Cutaneous lymphoma is generally treated with skin-directed therapies (SDT) during the early and localized stages. For the refractory or advanced stages, systemic therapies are used. Previously, retinoids and interferons were used for SDT-resistant cases. Only a few chemotherapy options were available for more advanced disease. In recent years, many novel agents have been introduced and the strategy for systemic therapy has changed, especially for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). For SDT, helical tomotherapy, a new radiation modality, has been drawing attention as an option for radiotherapy. Targeted therapies such as histone deacetylase inhibitors, mogamulizumab, brentuximab vedotin, and denileukin diftitox are new treatment options. Chemotherapy agents such as gemcitabine and pralatrexate have been introduced; they are expected to have meaningful efficacy as monotherapy. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is still considered for young patients with advanced CTCL as the only potentially curative treatment.
Due to their primary effects on DNA synthesis, antimetabolites are most effective against actively dividing cells and are significantly specific to the cell cycle phase. Pralatrexate (PDX), an antifolate metabolite designed to accumulate in cancer cells, was the first new agent approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of resistant/recurrent peripheral T-cell lymphomas. PDX was a drug that is frequently used not only for PTCL, but also for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), extranodal natural killer (NK) / T-cell lymphoma. This article reviews Pralatrexate's history, pharmacokinetics, clinical phase studies including phases I, II and III, types of cancers it is effective on, drug side effects, inhibition mechanism and even its use in the treatment of other cancers with innovative methods, including its antiviral effect against SARS-CoV-2 infection. A comprehensive internet-based research was planned, covering all published and unpublished studies on the subject. We conducted this review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for systematic reviews and metaanalysis (PRISMA-P), and Cochrane Collaboration reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. The results of the studies in the articles were recorded to include all phase studies. Pralatrexate was structurally designed to have enhanced cellular transport via RFC (reduced folate carrier type) and be subject to more polyglutamation compared to methotrexate. The enhanced polyglutamylation ability of pralatrexate is associated with increased tumor cell death and ultimately improved anticancer activity. Pralatrexate is considered a promising drug for patients with recurrent and treatment-resistant PTCL with a good survival advantage. At the same time, it is an antifolate agent with a significant advantage over methotrexate as it does not cause myelosuppression. While there are manageable side effects such as thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and mucositis, it is critical to explore
Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) represent a heterogeneous disease group accounting for 10% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. PTCL patients have typically poorer outcomes compared with aggressive B-cell lymphomas. However, such outcomes are heavily dependent on subtype. Although anthracycline-based regimens such as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone remain the standard first-line treatment for most aggressive PTCL, there are important variations including incorporation of novel agents, use of radiotherapy and judicious consideration of stem cell transplantation. Relapsed or refractory disease represents a significant area of unmet need where chemotherapy intensification has limited efficacy and novel agents such as brentuximab vedotin and pralatrexate provide additional opportunities for attainment of remission and potential stem cell transplant. In the future, pre-therapy prognostic biomarkers including genomic characterisation, may aid in risk stratification and help guide initial patient management to improve survival. There is an urgent need to understand better the pathogenesis of PTCL to facilitate novel drug combinatorial approaches to improve survival. This position statement represents an evidence-based synthesis of the literature for application in Australian and New Zealand practice.