cobimetinib
Sources réglementaires consultées
Indications approuvées
- Mélanome BRAF V600E/K non résécable ou métastatique uniquement avec vémurafénib ; les histiocytoses adultes peuvent être traitées en monothérapie.
Contre-indications
Absolues
- CIMA : hypersensibilité à la substance active ou aux excipients ; l’étiquette FDA n’établit aucune contre-indication formelle.
Mises en garde cliniques
- Surveiller la FEVG au départ, à 1 mois puis tous les 3 mois. Surveiller hémorragie, nouvelles tumeurs, fonction hépatique, CPK/créatinine et rhabdomyolyse. — OpenFDA, set_id c387579e-cee0-4334-bd1e-73f93ac1bde6
- Examiner la rétine au départ et en cas de symptômes ; occlusion veineuse rétinienne impose l’arrêt et rétinopathie séreuse impose suspension/réduction. Utiliser une photoprotection. — OpenFDA, set_id c387579e-cee0-4334-bd1e-73f93ac1bde6
Interactions médicamenteuses
- SévèreInhibiteurs ou inducteurs du CYP3A
Mécanisme: Ils modifient l’exposition au cobimétinib.
Recommandation: Éviter inhibiteurs puissants/modérés et inducteurs. Si un inhibiteur modéré est inévitable ≤14 jours à la dose de 60 mg, réduire à 20 mg puis revenir à 60 mg après son arrêt ; à 40 ou 20 mg utiliser une alternative.
OpenFDA, set_id c387579e-cee0-4334-bd1e-73f93ac1bde6
Effets indésirables
Communs (≥1%)
diarrhée · réaction de photosensibilité · nausées · fièvre · vomissements
Grossesse et allaitement
Les femmes doivent utiliser une contraception pendant et 2 semaines après. Ne pas allaiter pendant ni 2 semaines après. Peut altérer la fertilité féminine et masculine.
Bibliographie récente (PubMed)
Craniopharyngiomas, primary brain tumors of the pituitary-hypothalamic axis, can cause clinically significant sequelae. Treatment with the use of surgery, radiation, or both is often associated with substantial morbidity related to vision loss, neuroendocrine dysfunction, and memory loss. Genotyping has shown that more than 90% of papillary craniopharyngiomas carry BRAF V600E mutations, but data are lacking with regard to the safety and efficacy of BRAF-MEK inhibition in patients with papillary craniopharyngiomas who have not undergone previous radiation therapy. Eligible patients who had papillary craniopharyngiomas that tested positive for BRAF mutations, had not undergone radiation therapy previously, and had measurable disease received the BRAF-MEK inhibitor combination vemurafenib-cobimetinib in 28-day cycles. The primary end point of this single-group, phase 2 study was objective response at 4 months as determined with the use of centrally determined volumetric data. Of the 16 patients in the study, 15 (94%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 70 to 100) had a durable objective partial response or better to therapy. The median reduction in the volume of the tumor was 91% (range, 68 to 99). The median follow-up was 22 months (95% CI, 19 to 30) and the median number of treatment cycles was 8. Progression-free survival was 87% (95% CI, 57 to 98) at 12 months and 58% (95% CI, 10 to 89) at 24 months. Three patients had disease progression during follow-up after therapy had been discontinued; none have died. The sole patient who did not have a response stopped treatment after 8 days owing to toxic effects. Grade 3 adverse events that were at least possibly related to treatment occurred in 12 patients, including rash in 6 patients. In 2 patients, grade 4 adverse events (hyperglycemia in 1 patient and increased creatine kinase levels in 1 patient) were reported; 3 patients discontinued treatment owing to adverse events. In this small, single-group study involving patients w
Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is a rare and lethal cancer. Although progress has been made in recent years in patients with mutated BRAF tumors, those who respond initially eventually die of their disease; furthermore, there are no approved therapies for non-BRAF mutated tumors. To determine whether treatment with matched-targeted therapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors were associated with improved overall survival (OS). A phase 2 trial at a single center, tertiary institution with parallel cohorts, assigning treatment with targeted therapy according to the tumor mutation status. Patients with mutated BRAF V600E tumors received vemurafenib/cobimetinib plus atezolizumab (cohort 1); those with mutated RAS (NRAS, KRAS, or HRAS) or NF1/2 tumors received cobimetinib plus atezolizumab (cohort 2). Patients without any of these variants were assigned to receive bevacizumab plus atezolizumab (cohort 3). Patients were enrolled from August 3, 2017, to July 7, 2021. All consecutive, systemic therapy-naive patients with ATC with active disease and who met eligibility criteria were considered for participation. The analysis was conducted in September 2023. Patients were assigned to targeted therapy based on the driver mutation as follow: BRAF V600E (cohort 1, vemurafenib plus cobimetinib), RAS/NF (cohort 2, cobimetinib), or non-BRAF/RAS/NF (cohort 3, bevacizumab). All received atezolizumab. The primary outcome of the study was median OS of the entire targeted therapy cohort, compared with historical median OS of 5 months. Forty-three patients with ATC were enrolled in the targeted therapy cohorts, of which 42 were included in the primary analysis. The median OS in patients across these 3 cohorts was 19 months (95% CI, 7.79-43.24). Median OS and progression-free survival per cohort were as follows: cohort 1: 43 months (95% CI, 16-not estimable [NE]), 13.9 months (6.6-64.1); cohort 2: 8.7 months (95% CI, 5.1-37.0) and 4.8 months (1.8-14.7); cohort 3 (vascular endothelial gr
Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare, multisystemic, inflammatory, non-Langerhans cell histiocytic neoplasm. The discovery of recurrent and somatic mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway, most commonly BRAFV600E, has led to a reclassification of ECD from an inflammatory disorder to a neoplastic process. It is now included in the revised 2016 World Health Organization classification of hematopoietic tumors and in the Langerhans group in the revised 2016 Histiocytosis Classification of the Histiocyte Society. When symptomatic, ECD most commonly manifests with bone pain and fatigue. Also, neurologic manifestations, central diabetes insipidus, exophthalmos, and periorbital xanthelasma-like lesions are frequently encountered. Pathologic findings may vary depending on the site of biopsy and may display a spectrum of features. Thus, due to the diverse clinical presentation and variable histologic findings, imaging can often show the first sign of the disease. Radiologic findings are, however, interpreted in conjunction with clinical and histologic findings to establish the diagnosis of ECD. From providing classic findings that facilitate diagnosis to helping radiologists determine the extent of disease and predicting a prognosis, the role of radiology in ECD has evolved with the understanding of the disease itself. Insights into the molecular pathogenesis and the development of targeted therapeutic agents along with approval of vemurafenib and cobimetinib have necessitated revision of the guidelines for the management of ECD. The authors discuss various radiologic findings of ECD and differential diagnoses by using an organ system-based approach and briefly describe the revised consensus recommendations for evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment based on the International Medical Symposia on ECD from a radiologist's perspective. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. The full digital presentation is available online.
Despite advances in early detection as described in part 1 of this continuing medical education series, melanoma continues to be a large contributor to cutaneous cancer-related mortality. In a subset of patients with unresectable or metastatic disease, surgical clearance is often not possible; therefore, systemic and local therapies are considered. The second article in this series provides dermatologists with an up-to-date working knowledge of the treatment options that may be prescribed by oncologists for patients with unresectable stage III, stage IV, and recurrent melanoma.