zanubrutinib
Sources réglementaires consultées
Indications approuvées
- Macroglobulinémie de Waldenström chez l’adulte après au moins un traitement ou en première ligne si la chimio-immunothérapie ne convient pas ; lymphome de la zone marginale après au moins un anti-CD20 ; leucémie lymphoïde chronique ; et, avec obinutuzumab, lymphome folliculaire en rechute ou réfractaire après au moins deux traitements systémiques.
Contre-indications
Absolues
- Hypersensibilité au zanubrutinib ou aux excipients.
Mises en garde cliniques
- Peut provoquer une hémorragie grave ou mortelle. Ne pas associer à la warfarine ni aux antivitamines K, surveiller avec antiagrégants ou anticoagulants et envisager une suspension 3–7 jours avant et après une chirurgie. — CIMA/AEMPS, ficha técnica 1211576002
- Surveiller infections graves ou opportunistes, réactivation du VHB, cytopénies, fibrillation ou flutter auriculaire, syndrome de lyse tumorale et secondes tumeurs. Rechercher le VHB avant traitement et réaliser une NFS mensuelle. — CIMA/AEMPS, ficha técnica 1211576002
Interactions médicamenteuses
- SévèreInhibiteurs puissants ou modérés du CYP3A
Mécanisme: Ils augmentent l’exposition au zanubrutinib.
Recommandation: Avec un inhibiteur puissant, utiliser 80 mg/jour ; avec un inhibiteur modéré, 160 mg/jour ou 80 mg deux fois par jour. Surveiller la toxicité.
CIMA/AEMPS, ficha técnica 1211576002
- SévèreInducteurs puissants ou modérés du CYP3A
Mécanisme: Ils réduisent fortement l’exposition au zanubrutinib.
Recommandation: Éviter l’association, y compris le millepertuis.
CIMA/AEMPS, ficha técnica 1211576002
- SévèreWarfarine et autres antivitamines K
Mécanisme: Le zanubrutinib augmente le risque hémorragique et la sécurité de l’association n’est pas établie.
Recommandation: Ne pas associer ; si une anticoagulation est nécessaire, choisir une alternative et surveiller étroitement les saignements.
CIMA/AEMPS, ficha técnica 1211576002
Effets indésirables
Communs (≥1%)
infection des voies respiratoires supérieures · ecchymoses · saignement ou hématome · neutropénie · douleur musculosquelettique · éruption cutanée · pneumonie · diarrhée · toux · fatigue · thrombopénie
Grossesse et allaitement
Ne pas utiliser le zanubrutinib pendant la grossesse. Vérifier l’absence de grossesse avant traitement ; utiliser une contraception très efficace pendant le traitement et pendant 1 mois après. En cas de contraception hormonale, ajouter une méthode barrière. Interrompre l’allaitement pendant le traitement.
Bibliographie récente (PubMed)
TP53-mutant mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is associated with poor survival outcomes with standard chemoimmunotherapy. We conducted a multicenter, phase 2 study of zanubrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax (BOVen) in untreated patients with MCL with a TP53 mutation. Patients initially received 160 mg zanubrutinib twice daily and obinutuzumab. Obinutuzumab at a dose of 1000 mg was given on cycle 1 day 1, 8, and 15, and on day 1 of cycles 2 to 8. After 2 cycles, venetoclax was added with weekly dose ramp-up to 400 mg daily. After 24 cycles, if patients were in complete remission with undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) using an immunosequencing assay, treatment was discontinued. The primary end point was met if ≥11 patients were progression free at 2 years. The study included 25 patients with untreated MCL with a TP53 mutation. The best overall response rate was 96% (24/25) and the complete response rate was 88% (22/25). Frequency of uMRD at a sensitivity level of 1 × 10-5 and uMRD at a sensitivity level of 1 × 10-6 at cycle 13 was 95% (18/19) and 84% (16/19), respectively. With a median follow-up of 28.2 months, the 2-year progression-free, disease-specific, and overall survival were 72%, 91%, and 76%, respectively. Common side effects were generally low grade and included diarrhea (64%), neutropenia (32%), and infusion-related reactions (24%). BOVen was well tolerated and met its primary efficacy end point in TP53-mutant MCL. These data support its use and ongoing evaluation. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03824483.
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), defined by a minimum of 5 × 109/L monoclonal B cells in the blood, affects more than 200 000 people and is associated with approximately 4410 deaths in the US annually. CLL is associated with an immunocompromised state and an increased rate of complications from infections. At the time of diagnosis, the median age of patients with CLL is 70 years, and an estimated 95% of patients have at least 1 medical comorbidity. Approximately 70% to 80% of patients with CLL are asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis, and one-third will never require treatment for CLL. Prognostic models have been developed to estimate the time to first treatment and the overall survival, but for patients who are asymptomatic, irrespective of disease risk category, clinical observation is the standard of care. Patients with symptomatic disease who have bulky or progressive lymphadenopathy or hepatosplenomegaly and those with a low neutrophil count, anemia, or thrombocytopenia and/or symptoms of fever, drenching night sweats, and weight loss (B symptoms) should be offered treatment. For these patients, first-line treatment consists of a regimen containing either a covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor (acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, or ibrutinib) or a B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitor (venetoclax). There is no evidence that starting either class before the other improves outcomes. The covalent BTK inhibitors are typically used indefinitely. Survival rates are approximately 88% at 4 years for acalabrutinib, 94% at 2 years for zanubrutinib, and 78% at 7 years for ibrutinib. Venetoclax is prescribed in combination with obinutuzumab, a monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, in first-line treatment for 1 year (overall survival, 82% at 5-year follow-up). A noncovalent BTK inhibitor, pitobrutinib, has shown an overall response rate of more than 70% after failure of covalent BTK inhibitors and venetoclax. Phosphoinositide 3'-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors (idelalisib
Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma with immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal protein. Clinical features include anemia, thrombocytopenia, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, and rarely hyperviscosity. The presence of IgM monoclonal protein associated with ≥ 10% clonal lymphoplasmacytic cells in bone marrow confirms the diagnosis. The L265P mutation in MYD88 is detectable in more than 90% of patients and is found in most IgM MGUS patients. MYD88 is not required for the diagnosis. Age, albumin, hemoglobin level, platelet count, β2 microglobulin, Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and monoclonal IgM concentrations are characteristics that are predictive of outcomes. Not all patients who fulfill WM criteria require therapy; these patients can be observed until symptoms develop. Rituximab-monotherapy is inferior to combination regimens. Recommended first-line therapy can be chemoimmunotherapy or a covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The preferred Mayo Clinic induction is either rituximab and bendamustine (without rituximab maintenance) or zanubrutinib. Bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, thalidomide, everolimus, pirtobrutinib, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, bendamustine, and venetoclax have all been shown to have activity in relapsed WM. Given WM's natural history, the reduction of therapy toxicity is an important part of treatment selection. Most patients succumb to causes unrelated to macroglobulinemia.
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is caused by premature erythrocyte destruction mediated by autoantibodies (auto-Ab) with or without complement activation. The most frequent form (60%-70% of cases) is warm AIHA (wAIHA), driven by immunoglobulin G auto-Ab that react at body temperature. Cold agglutinin disease (CAD, 20%-25%) is the second most common form and is caused by immunoglobulin M auto-Ab that usually react at temperatures <20°C and strongly activate complement. Rarer forms (5%-10%) include mixed AIHAs (wAIHA plus CAD), and paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria. Here, we present the management of wAIHA, as CAD is discussed separately. Approximately 50% of wAIHA are primary, whereas the remainder are secondary to various conditions (infections, lymphoproliferative disorders, systemic or organ-specific autoimmune diseases, congenital immunodeficiencies, hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, and several drugs, including immune checkpoint inhibitors). The disease is highly heterogeneous, ranging from fully compensated to life-threatening, and frequently has a relapsing course. Standard first-line therapy includes steroids with or without intravenous immunoglobulin, transfusions when anemia is clinically significant, prophylactic anticoagulation for severe hemolysis, and recombinant erythropoietin when reticulocytopenia/inadequate bone marrow compensation is present. For severe cases, high-dose steroids and plasma-exchange may be considered. Rituximab is now the preferred second-line option for relapsed/refractory patients, comparing favorably with the traditional splenectomy. The latter is increasingly reserved for later lines together with classic immunosuppressants. Several novel treatments are in development for refractory wAIHA, encompassing drugs targeting B-cells (parsaclisib, ibrutinib, rilzabrutinib, zanubrutinib, obexelimab, ianalumab, povetacicept), plasma cells (bortezomib, daratumumab), spleen tyrosine kinase (fostamatinib, sovleplenib), and the neonata
In a multinational, phase 3, head-to-head trial, ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, was compared with zanubrutinib, a BTK inhibitor with greater specificity, as treatment for relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). In prespecified interim analyses, zanubrutinib was superior to ibrutinib with respect to overall response (the primary end point). Data from the final analysis of progression-free survival are now available. We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with relapsed or refractory CLL or SLL who had received at least one previous course of therapy to receive zanubrutinib or ibrutinib until the occurrence of disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. In this final analysis, progression-free survival (a key secondary end point) was assessed with the use of a hierarchical testing strategy to determine whether zanubrutinib was noninferior to ibrutinib. If noninferiority was established, the superiority of zanubrutinib was assessed and claimed if the two-sided P value was less than 0.05. At a median follow-up of 29.6 months, zanubrutinib was found to be superior to ibrutinib with respect to progression-free survival among 652 patients (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, [CI], 0.49 to 0.86; P = 0.002), as assessed by the investigators; the results were similar to those as assessed by an independent-review committee. At 24 months, the investigator-assessed rates of progression-free survival were 78.4% in the zanubrutinib group and 65.9% in the ibrutinib group. Among patients with a 17p deletion, a TP53 mutation, or both, those who received zanubrutinib had longer progression-free survival than those who received ibrutinib (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.88); progression-free survival across other major subgroups consistently favored zanubrutinib. The percentage of patients with an overall response