Atezolizumab
Sources réglementaires consultées
Indications approuvées
- Cancer bronchique non à petites cellules : traitement adjuvant du stade II–IIIA après résection et jusqu’à 4 cycles de chimiothérapie au platine si le ligand 1 de mort programmée (PD-L1) est ≥1 % selon un test autorisé ; monothérapie métastatique de première ligne si l’expression de PD-L1 dans les cellules tumorales (TC) est ≥50 % ou dans les cellules immunitaires (IC) ≥10 % selon un test autorisé et sans altération EGFR ou ALK ; première ligne sans altération EGFR ou ALK avec bévacizumab, paclitaxel et carboplatine, ou avec paclitaxel lié aux protéines et carboplatine, dans la maladie non épidermoïde ; et après progression pendant ou après le platine et, en cas d’EGFR ou d’ALK positif, après le traitement ciblé correspondant.
- Cancer bronchique à petites cellules au stade étendu : première ligne avec carboplatine et étoposide ; et entretien avec lurbinectédine après induction par TECENTRIQ intraveineux ou atezolizumab avec hyaluronidase sous-cutané, carboplatine et étoposide. La formulation indiquée est l’atezolizumab intraveineux.
- Carcinome hépatocellulaire non résécable ou métastatique sans traitement systémique antérieur, avec bévacizumab ; mélanome avec mutation BRAF V600 avec cobimétinib et vémurafénib ; et sarcome alvéolaire des parties molles non résécable ou métastatique à partir de 2 ans.
- Cancer de la vessie infiltrant le muscle en adjuvant avec maladie résiduelle minimale positive par ADN tumoral circulant déterminée par un test autorisé après cystectomie.
Mises en garde cliniques
- Mise en garde majeure · Il peut provoquer des réactions immunomédiées sévères ou mortelles dans tout organe. Surveiller avant et pendant le traitement ; suspendre au grade 3 et arrêter au grade 4, en cas de récidive sévère ou d’impossibilité de réduire les corticostéroïdes selon l’information de prescription. — DailyMed, TECENTRIQ set_id 6fa682c9-a312-4932-9831-f286908660ee
- Mise en garde majeure · Il peut provoquer des réactions graves à la perfusion et des complications sévères ou mortelles après greffe allogénique de cellules souches hématopoïétiques. — DailyMed, TECENTRIQ set_id 6fa682c9-a312-4932-9831-f286908660ee
Effets indésirables
Communs (≥1%)
fatigue ou asthénie · diminution de l’appétit · nausées · toux ou dyspnée · alopécie · constipation ou diarrhée · hypertension ou protéinurie avec bévacizumab · éruption cutanée
Rares mais graves
réaction immunomédiée sévère ou mortelle · réaction grave à la perfusion · complication mortelle après greffe allogénique
Grossesse et allaitement
Il peut provoquer une toxicité fœtale. Vérifier la grossesse avant le traitement ; utiliser une contraception efficace pendant le traitement et pendant 5 mois après. Ne pas allaiter pendant le traitement ni pendant 5 mois après.
Bibliographie récente (PubMed)
IMbrave150 demonstrated that atezolizumab plus bevacizumab led to significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma at the primary analysis (after a median 8.6 months of follow-up). We present updated data after 12 months of additional follow-up. Patients with systemic treatment-naive, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were randomized 2:1 to receive 1,200 mg atezolizumab plus 15 mg/kg bevacizumab intravenously every 3 weeks or 400 mg sorafenib orally twice daily in this open-label, phase III study. Co-primary endpoints were OS and PFS by independently assessed RECIST 1.1 in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary efficacy endpoints included objective response rates and exploratory subgroup efficacy analyses. This is a post hoc updated analysis of efficacy and safety. From March 15, 2018, to January 30, 2019, 501 patients (intention-to-treat population) were randomly allocated to receive atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (n = 336) or sorafenib (n = 165). On August 31, 2020, after a median 15.6 (range, 0-28.6) months of follow-up, the median OS was 19.2 months (95% CI 17.0-23.7) with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and 13.4 months (95% CI 11.4-16.9) with sorafenib (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66; 95% CI 0.52-0.85; descriptive p <0.001). The median PFS was 6.9 (95% CI 5.7-8.6) and 4.3 (95% CI 4.0-5.6) months in the respective treatment groups (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.53-0.81; descriptive p < 0.001). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 143 (43%) of 329 and 72 (46%) of 156 safety-evaluable patients in the respective groups, and treatment-related grade 5 events occurred in 6 (2%) and 1 (<1%) patients. After longer follow-up, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab maintained clinically meaningful survival benefits over sorafenib and had a safety profile consistent with the primary analysis. NCT03434379. The primary analysis of IMbrave150 showed that atezolizumab plu
Despite improved efficacy with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum-based chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), survival remains poor. In this study, we aimed to compare lurbinectedin plus atezolizumab and atezolizumab alone as maintenance therapies in patients with ES-SCLC without progression after induction therapy with atezolizumab, carboplatin, and etoposide. IMforte was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial done at 96 hospitals and medical centres in 13 countries (Belgium, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Mexico, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Türkiye, the UK, and the USA). Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with treatment-naive ES-SCLC. Patients received four 21-day cycles of induction treatment (atezolizumab, carboplatin, and etoposide). After completing induction treatment, eligible patients without disease progression were randomly assigned (1:1) using permuted blocks (Interactive Voice/Web Response System) to receive maintenance treatment intravenously every 3 weeks with lurbinectedin (3·2 mg/m2; with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis) plus atezolizumab (1200 mg) or atezolizumab (1200 mg). The two primary endpoints were independent review facility-assessed (IRF) progression-free survival and overall survival, measured from randomisation into the maintenance phase. Efficacy endpoints were assessed in the full analysis set, which included all patients who were randomly assigned to maintenance phase treatment, regardless of whether they received their assigned study treatment. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of lurbinectedin or atezolizumab, and was analysed according to the treatment received. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05091567, and is closed for recruitment. Between Nov 17, 2021, and Jan 11, 2024, 895 patients were screened for enrolment, of whom 660 (74%) were enrolled into the induction phase. Between May 24, 2022,
Patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer have varied outcomes after cystectomy. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based detection of molecular residual disease may identify patients at high risk for recurrence after cystectomy who can benefit from adjuvant immunotherapy, thus sparing patients at lower risk from unnecessary treatment burden. In a phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial, we used serial ctDNA testing to monitor (for up to 1 year) patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and no radiographic evidence of disease after surgery. Eligible patients who tested ctDNA-positive during surveillance were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive intravenous atezolizumab or placebo every 4 weeks for up to 1 year. The primary end point was investigator-assessed disease-free survival. Overall survival was a secondary end point that was assessed in a hierarchical fashion to control for alpha. Patients who persistently tested ctDNA-negative did not receive atezolizumab or placebo. A total of 761 patients were enrolled; 250 eligible patients who tested ctDNA-positive underwent randomization (167 to the atezolizumab group and 83 to the placebo group). The median disease-free survival was 9.9 months with atezolizumab, as compared with 4.8 months with placebo (hazard ratio for first event of disease recurrence or death, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.87; P = 0.005). The median overall survival was 32.8 months with atezolizumab, as compared with 21.1 months with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.90; P = 0.01). A total of 28% of the patients who received atezolizumab and 22% of those who received placebo had adverse events of grade 3 or 4 (related to atezolizumab or placebo in 7% vs. 4%); 3% and 2% of the patients, respectively, had fatal adverse events (related to atezolizumab or placebo in 2% vs. none). Among 357 patients with persistent ctDNA-negative status, disease-free survival was 95% at the end of the 1-year monitoring perio
Novel adjuvant strategies are needed to optimise outcomes after complete surgical resection in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to evaluate adjuvant atezolizumab versus best supportive care after adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in these patients. IMpower010 was a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study done at 227 sites in 22 countries and regions. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with completely resected stage IB (tumours ≥4 cm) to IIIA NSCLC per the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer and American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (7th edition). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a permuted-block method (block size of four) to receive adjuvant atezolizumab (1200 mg every 21 days; for 16 cycles or 1 year) or best supportive care (observation and regular scans for disease recurrence) after adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy (one to four cycles). The primary endpoint, investigator-assessed disease-free survival, was tested hierarchically first in the stage II-IIIA population subgroup whose tumours expressed PD-L1 on 1% or more of tumour cells (SP263), then all patients in the stage II-IIIA population, and finally the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (stage IB-IIIA). Safety was evaluated in all patients who were randomly assigned and received atezolizumab or best supportive care. IMpower010 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02486718 (active, not recruiting). Between Oct 7, 2015, and Sept 19, 2018, 1280 patients were enrolled after complete resection. 1269 received adjuvant chemotherapy, of whom 1005 patients were eligible for randomisation to atezolizumab (n=507) or best supportive care (n=498); 495 in each group received treatment. After a median follow-up of 32·2 months (IQR 27·4-38·3) in the stage II-IIIA population, atezolizumab treatment improved disease-free survival compared with best supportive care in patients in the stage II-IIIA population whose tumours expressed PD-L1
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is lethal in 88% of patients1, yet harbours mutation-derived T cell neoantigens that are suitable for vaccines 2,3. Here in a phase I trial of adjuvant autogene cevumeran, an individualized neoantigen vaccine based on uridine mRNA-lipoplex nanoparticles, we synthesized mRNA neoantigen vaccines in real time from surgically resected PDAC tumours. After surgery, we sequentially administered atezolizumab (an anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy), autogene cevumeran (a maximum of 20 neoantigens per patient) and a modified version of a four-drug chemotherapy regimen (mFOLFIRINOX, comprising folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin). The end points included vaccine-induced neoantigen-specific T cells by high-threshold assays, 18-month recurrence-free survival and oncologic feasibility. We treated 16 patients with atezolizumab and autogene cevumeran, then 15 patients with mFOLFIRINOX. Autogene cevumeran was administered within 3 days of benchmarked times, was tolerable and induced de novo high-magnitude neoantigen-specific T cells in 8 out of 16 patients, with half targeting more than one vaccine neoantigen. Using a new mathematical strategy to track T cell clones (CloneTrack) and functional assays, we found that vaccine-expanded T cells comprised up to 10% of all blood T cells, re-expanded with a vaccine booster and included long-lived polyfunctional neoantigen-specific effector CD8+ T cells. At 18-month median follow-up, patients with vaccine-expanded T cells (responders) had a longer median recurrence-free survival (not reached) compared with patients without vaccine-expanded T cells (non-responders; 13.4 months, P = 0.003). Differences in the immune fitness of the patients did not confound this correlation, as responders and non-responders mounted equivalent immunity to a concurrent unrelated mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Thus, adjuvant atezolizumab, autogene cevumeran and mFOLFIRINOX induces substantial T cell activity that