Cemiplimab
Sources réglementaires consultées
Indications approuvées
- Carcinome épidermoïde cutané métastatique ou localement avancé non éligible à une chirurgie curative ou à une radiothérapie ; et traitement adjuvant de la maladie cutanée à haut risque après chirurgie et radiothérapie.
- Carcinome basocellulaire localement avancé ou métastatique après un inhibiteur de la voie Hedgehog ou lorsque ce traitement n’est pas approprié.
- Cancer bronchique non à petites cellules sans altération EGFR, ALK ou ROS1 : traitement de première ligne de la maladie localement avancée non éligible à une chirurgie ni à une chimioradiothérapie définitive, ou métastatique, avec chimiothérapie au platine ; ou monothérapie dans ces populations si le score de proportion tumorale PD-L1 (TPS) est ≥50 % selon un test autorisé par la FDA.
Mises en garde cliniques
- Mise en garde majeure · Il peut provoquer des réactions immunomédiées sévères ou mortelles dans tout organe. Surveiller avant et pendant le traitement ; suspendre au grade 3 et arrêter au grade 4, en cas de récidive sévère ou d’impossibilité de réduire les corticostéroïdes selon l’information de prescription. — DailyMed, LIBTAYO set_id 4347ae1f-d397-4f18-8b70-03897e1c054a
- Mise en garde majeure · Il peut provoquer des réactions graves à la perfusion et des complications sévères ou mortelles après greffe allogénique de cellules souches hématopoïétiques. — DailyMed, LIBTAYO set_id 4347ae1f-d397-4f18-8b70-03897e1c054a
Effets indésirables
Communs (≥1%)
fatigue · douleur musculosquelettique · éruption cutanée · diarrhée · anémie · prurit · alopécie · nausées · neuropathie périphérique · diminution de l’appétit
Rares mais graves
réaction immunomédiée sévère ou mortelle · réaction grave à la perfusion · complication mortelle après greffe allogénique
Grossesse et allaitement
Il peut provoquer une toxicité fœtale. Vérifier la grossesse avant le traitement ; utiliser une contraception efficace pendant le traitement et pendant 4 mois après. Ne pas allaiter pendant le traitement ni pendant 4 mois après.
Bibliographie récente (PubMed)
Patients who have cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma with high-risk features are at risk for recurrence after definitive local therapy. The benefit of systemic adjuvant therapy options has not been well established in clinical trials. In a phase 3, randomized trial, we enrolled patients with local or regional cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, after surgical resection and postoperative radiotherapy, at high risk for recurrence owing to nodal features (extracapsular extension with largest node ≥20 mm in diameter or at least three involved nodes) or nonnodal features (in-transit metastases, T4 lesion [with bone invasion], perineural invasion, or locally recurrent tumor with ≥1 additional risk feature). Patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive adjuvant cemiplimab (350 mg) or placebo, administered intravenously every 3 weeks for 12 weeks, followed by a dose increase to 700 mg administered every 6 weeks for up to 36 weeks (≤48 weeks total). The primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included freedom from locoregional recurrence, freedom from distant recurrence, and safety. A total of 415 patients were assigned to cemiplimab (209) or placebo (206). The median follow-up was 24 months. Cemiplimab was superior to placebo with respect to disease-free survival (24 vs. 65 events; hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20 to 0.51; P<0.001). The estimated 24-month disease-free survival was 87.1% (95% CI, 80.3 to 91.6) with cemiplimab and 64.1% (95% CI, 55.9 to 71.1) with placebo. Cemiplimab led to lower risks of locoregional recurrence (9 events, vs. 40 with placebo; hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.40) and distant recurrence (10 vs. 26 events; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.72). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 23.9% of the patients who received cemiplimab and in 14.2% of those who received placebo; discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 9.8% and 1.5%, respectivel
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve outcomes in a wide range of cancers; however, serious adverse effects, including cardiovascular adverse effects (CVAEs), can occur. To determine the incidence of CVAEs and analyze data on the management of myocarditis in patients exposed to ICIs. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception were searched on April 4, 2023. Two separate studies were performed. Key inclusion criteria for study 1 were phases 1 to 4 trials involving adults with malignant neoplasms treated with an ICI and toxicity data; for study 2, publications (case reports and retrospective analyses) on clinical manifestations and treatment of patients with ICI-induced CVAEs. Studies with dose escalation or fewer than 11 patients in each group and all case reports, retrospective analyses, letters, reviews, and editorials were excluded from study 1. Studies not published in English were excluded from study 2. The PRISMA guidelines and Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews were followed. Data were extracted independently by 2 researchers. A meta-analysis of the incidence of CVAEs in clinical trials and a systematic review of the evidence for the management of myocarditis were performed. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. In study 1, the primary outcome was incidence CVAEs in clinical trials with ICIs and ICI combination therapies. Study 2 examined evidence supporting specific management strategies that may decrease the mortality rate of myocarditis. The primary outcomes were planned before data collection began. In study 1, a total of 83 315 unique participants in 589 unique trials were included in the meta-analysis. Incidence of CVAEs induced by anti-programmed cell death 1 and/or programmed cell death ligand 1 was 0.80% (95% CI, 0%-1.66%) in clinical trials, with no differences between the compounds, except for cemiplimab, which was associated with a higher risk of CVAEs. Incidence of CVAEs following ipilimu
The discovery of immune checkpoint proteins such as PD-1/PDL-1 and CTLA-4 represents a significant breakthrough in the field of cancer immunotherapy. Therefore, humanized monoclonal antibodies, targeting these immune checkpoint proteins have been utilized successfully in patients with metastatic melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck cancers and non-small lung cancer. The US FDA has successfully approved three different categories of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as PD-1 inhibitors (Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, and Cemiplimab), PDL-1 inhibitors (Atezolimumab, Durvalumab and Avelumab), and CTLA-4 inhibitor (Ipilimumab). Unfortunately, not all patients respond favourably to these drugs, highlighting the role of biomarkers such as Tumour mutation burden (TMB), PDL-1 expression, microbiome, hypoxia, interferon-γ, and ECM in predicting responses to ICIs-based immunotherapy. The current study aims to review the literature and updates on ICIs in cancer therapy.
Immunology-based therapies are emerging as an effective cancer treatment, using the body's immune system to target tumors. Immune checkpoints, which regulate immune responses to prevent tissue damage and autoimmunity, are often exploited by cancer cells to avoid destruction. The discovery of checkpoint proteins like PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 was pivotal in developing cancer immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown great success, with FDA-approved drugs like PD-1 inhibitors (Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Cemiplimab), PD-L1 inhibitors (Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, Avelumab), and CTLA-4 inhibitors (Ipilimumab, Tremelimumab), alongside LAG-3 inhibitor Relatlimab. Research continues on new checkpoints like TIM-3, VISTA, B7-H3, BTLA, and TIGIT. Biomarkers like PDL-1 expression, tumor mutation burden, interferon-γ presence, microbiome composition, and extracellular matrix characteristics play a crucial role in predicting responses to immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors. Despite their effectiveness, not all patients experience the same level of benefit, and organ-specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs) such as rash or itching, colitis, diarrhea, hyperthyroidism, and hypothyroidism may occur. Given the rapid advancements in this field and the variability in patient outcomes, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive review that consolidates the latest findings on immune checkpoint inhibitors, covering their clinical status, biomarkers, resistance mechanisms, strategies to overcome resistance, and associated adverse effects. This review aims to fill this gap by providing an analysis of the current clinical status of ICIs, emerging biomarkers, mechanisms of resistance, strategies to enhance therapeutic efficacy, and assessment of adverse effects. This review is crucial to furthering our understanding of ICIs and optimizing their application in cancer therapy.
First-line cemiplimab (anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)) monotherapy has previously shown significant improvement in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) and PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50%. EMPOWER-Lung 3 ( NCT03409614 ), a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, examined cemiplimab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment for aNSCLC, irrespective of PD-L1 expression or histology. In this study, 466 patients with stage III/IV aNSCLC without EGFR, ALK or ROS1 genomic tumor aberrations were randomized (2:1) to receive cemiplimab 350 mg (n = 312) or placebo (n = 154) every 3 weeks for up to 108 weeks in combination with four cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy (followed by pemetrexed maintenance as indicated). In total, 57.1% (266/466 patients) had non-squamous NSCLC, and 85.2% (397/466 patients) had stage IV disease. The primary endpoint was OS. The trial was stopped early per recommendation of the independent data monitoring committee, based on meeting preset OS efficacy criteria: median OS was 21.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 15.5-not evaluable) with cemiplimab plus chemotherapy versus 13.0 months (95% CI, 11.9-16.1) with placebo plus chemotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.93; P = 0.014). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred with cemiplimab plus chemotherapy (43.6%, 136/312 patients) and placebo plus chemotherapy (31.4%, 48/153 patients). Cemiplimab is only the second anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agent to show efficacy in aNSCLC as both monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy for both squamous and non-squamous histologies.