Iatra · reviewing physician

Your signature attests to your judgment, not to a machine's text.

We are looking for physicians to review and sign clinical guidance reports. Before you apply, we want to be very clear about what this work is — and what it is not.

Let's start with the uncomfortable part

A product like this carries an obvious risk: that the physician becomes a rubber stamp. That the AI writes twenty pages and the doctor just clicks “approve”. That would be dangerous for the patient, indefensible for you, and it is exactly what medical ethics forbid: the practice of medicine is personal, and each physician answers for their own acts.

So Iatra is built the other way around. What the automated analysis produces is a supporting dossier. The text the patient reads first, and the one your signature backs, is written by you.

What exactly is asked of you

1Read the dossierAn already cross-checked analysis: medication, interactions, renal and hepatic adjustment, lab values, prescribing criteria for older adults. It comes with sources cited.
2Write your clinical assessmentYour professional opinion on the case: the two or three findings that truly matter, what should be discussed with the treating physician, and next steps. In your own words.
3Request adjustments if neededIf the dossier has something wrong or missing, you flag it and the system regenerates with your corrections. Then you see the changes marked.
4SignWith your name and your license number. The signature attests to your assessment — the one you wrote.

The system will not let you sign without your own assessment

This is not bureaucracy: it is what makes this a clinical act rather than a formality. If your assessment is too brief, or identical to the draft the AI suggested, signing is blocked.

You may ask the AI for a draft — but you must edit it and make it yours. Accepting it as-is does not enable signing.
There is a record of how much you rewrote. That is the evidence the review was real.
If anyone ever asks whether these reviews were substantive, that evidence answers for you.

What is NOT asked of you

You do not diagnose. The deliverable is a guidance report, never a certificate.
You do not examine the patient or take over their care. No doctor-patient relationship is created.
You do not replace the treating physician: the report exists so the next appointment goes further.
You do not answer for the automated content — you answer for your assessment, as in any medical act.

The legal framing

Each country has its own rules and the system applies them at the moment of signing: local professional registration, patient consent, and what the document may be called. The deliverable is always a “report” — never a “certificate”, because certifying implies having examined the person.

In Colombia, the launch market: current ReTHUS registration is required. The report is signed with full name and ReTHUS number, in Spanish, and the user is informed that artificial intelligence is involved.

Time and fees

A review takes 15 to 20 minutes: the dossier is already prepared, there is no patient in front of you, and the work is your judgment on a prepared case.

The fee is adjusted to each country's market — anchored to what a private consultation is worth there, not to an institutional salary. For reviewing and signing:

The fee is adjusted to each country's market — anchored to what a private consultation is worth there, not to an institutional salary. For reviewing and signing:
Country	Per signed report
Colombia	$10
Mexico	$9
Peru	$8
Chile	$14
Argentina	$10
Brazil	$15

Reviewing always pays more than recommending: the signature is real responsibility. Settlement is monthly, via PayPal or Wise, and you see accrued earnings on your dashboard.

Who we are looking for

A physician with current professional registration in their country.
Comfortable reasoning about polypharmacy in older adults: interactions, deprescribing, renal adjustment.
Someone who understands that the value here is their judgment — and wants to put it in writing.
Availability to review consistently, not sporadically.

If what you are looking for is to quickly validate what a machine already wrote, this work will frustrate you. It is fair to say so upfront.

If this sounds like how you work

Apply and let's talk. Sign-up takes a few minutes: your details, your specialty and your license number.

Apply as a reviewer

Tick “I also want to review and sign reports” in the form.

One-page summary (PDF)

Iatra is a clinical guidance tool. It does not replace a physician's examination or judgment.